Gender Differences in Motivational and Curricular Pathways Towards Postsecondary Computing Majors

Gender disparities persist in postsecondary computing fields, despite improvements in postsecondary equity overall and STEM fields as an aggregate. The entrenchment of this issue requires a comprehensive, longitudinal lens. Building on expectancy-value theory, the present study examines the relationships among students’ gender-ability stereotypes, attainment values, course-taking, and major choices. Using data from the High School Longitudinal Study of 2009 (HSLS: 2009), we applied weighted t-tests and multiple-group structural equation modeling to investigate how motivational beliefs (i.e., gender-ability stereotypes, attainment values) and course-taking patterns in math and science may predict major choice in computing. Overall, we find gender differences in identity-based mathematics and science motivational beliefs have long-term effects. Gender-ability stereotypes in math and science shape attainment values in each domain, whereby stereotypes suppress girls’ attainment values and enhance boys? attainment values (p < 0.001), in turn shaping course-taking and major decisions. Math- and sciencerelated motivational and curricular factors affect “other” STEM more than computing major outcomes. Specifically, computer science course-taking is completed more by boys (d = 0.21), but girls’ chances of declaring computing majors are especially enhanced by completing these courses in high school. Advanced science course-taking and science attainment value positively predict boys’ but not girls’ likelihood of declaring computing majors. We discuss the implications of these findings for research, policy, and practice. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2023.